“Promising to someday write more than Twitters”
Hey Moms!
Is your daughter starting to reach that special age, that magical time between when her adult teeth have grown in but no secondary sexual characteristics have?
Are you looking for the perfect role model for your little girl, the friend who will never let her down, the one who will never be prettier or threaten to diminish her self-esteem? The one who will dress conservatively and look polite for all eternity?
Have you ever considered mummifying your daughter to preserve her innocence, but found state and federal laws too constricting?
Then you might just be interested in a MyTwinn (the just-like-me doll)!

Aaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhh!!!
Easily the creepiest thing I’ve seen on the internet since the Fleshlight, MyTwinn dolls are custom made to your (and by “your”, MyTwinn is very specific in meaning “affluent moms’”) specifications. Everything from the clothes right down to the number of freckles can be specifically ordered, processed and hand-painted by a MyTwinn artist, in order to produce a doll that is an exact plastic duplicate of your daughter.
Let’s check out the sales pitch:

Ooooookay, who wants to start? Me? Nobody has a comment? All right then.
On the surface, there isn’t anything wrong with what MyTwinn is selling. The sane, logical Arial copy explains the process in straightforward brochure-style sales-speak, detailing their process while promising beauty, personalized service and craftsmanship. One might find the same kind of promises for model airplanes, or hand-made jewellery.
No, it’s the other promises — the ones injected in random super-pink handwritten font — that expose the evil at work here:
It’s one thing to sell weird lookalike dolls, but it’s creepy to sell them to Moms, and it’s downright freaky to do it in the imagined voice of their soon-to-be-grateful daughters. I know that parents are the actual buyers for toys — I have a nephew, I see what my sister goes through — but the fiction that everyone subscribes to is that toys are actually for the kids. Here is the five-step, commonly-accepted toy concept flow:
Yes, parents buy the toys that they want their kids to play with, or enroll them in the sports they want their kids to play, or force them into the dance/song/arts they want their kids to be good at. We get that, and generally speaking we as a society acknowledge that it is both common practice and psychotic. Toymakers oblige them by marketing directly to children, trading off the nuisance of having to buy Yu-Gi-Oh in exchange for the privelege of foisting magic kits, train sets or telescopes on their kids as well.
MyTwinn, instead, does two things:
On the one hand, this is so optimistic that it’s heartbreaking; on the other, this is so weird that it’s heartbreaking. Are there kids out there who are really thrilled when they’re confronted with a plasticized body double? Are there parents who really expect to hear things like, “She’s special, like me!”?
Apparently there are: “My daughter, Kara, received her MyTwinn doll for Christmas. Kara just stared at her in amazement. She was so happy…” (emphasis mine)

Yeah-huh. I doubt she had the words.
Incidentally, Dads (or Moms with no other recourse), MyTwinn hasn’t forgotten about you. Whatever your race, color, creed or size, MyTwinn is ready to help build an exact duplicate of your son… as long as he’s a gay disco queen with baseball-themed pants.

Final rating:
THREE OUT OF FIVE SCREAMS OF HORROR





So I'm done having killer mysterious headaches and surprising personal calamities and getting doubly suprising promotions. I Twitter now (peep that HA HA HA see what I did there) and I'm back to blogging, so it's now officially more than you can stand.
Egora
December 19th, 2007 at 2:58 pm
Somebody once said that they were going to buy me one of these godforsaken things for Christmas. Thinking that he was serious and would *never* lie to me, I desperately scrambled to come up with some manner of a positive spin to the situation….it was a slippery slope, and I failed miserably in trying to see the silver lining. Thankfully he was ‘joking’, and although I might never fully trust him again the way that I once did, at least I don’t have to deal with a miniature mug watching me get dressed every morning….
Meg
December 19th, 2007 at 3:23 pm
I think you should up the fright factor. That’s definitely worse than the Fleshlight. After a certain age — like three — dolls are super creepy. I don’t get it, it’s weird, and the one on the bed totally looks evil. It looks like it’s just biding time, until it can kill the little girl and start wreaking havoc on the town.
I’m surprised you passed up the opportunity to link to the Fleshlight post?
Mike
December 19th, 2007 at 3:31 pm
I figured that once a quarter or so was appropriate to link to the Fleshlight article, given all the creepy fuckers it attracts.
As well, believe me when I said I had a tough time deciding about the fright factor — on the one hand, did you see that one picture of the girl and her doll with the scary eyes? Jesus loves me, that was upsetting.
On the other hand, is it as upsetting as dudes banging enthusiastically away at genitals molded into plastic flashlights? No.
So, in the end, I stand by my rating.
Meg
December 19th, 2007 at 4:39 pm
Point taken. Just promise me that if you ever come across a MyTwinn Fleshlight, that it will receive the highest horror rating possible.
Tara
December 19th, 2007 at 8:52 pm
Why are there two n’s at the end of twin? Was one not enough?! The lack of care in spelling a childrens product is alarming in and of itself.
Glark
December 20th, 2007 at 2:54 pm
Arrrr. That’ll be in my nightmares tonight. Thank you.
kim smith
December 27th, 2007 at 11:15 pm
i think all of you are very desturbed people get a life ,sick ohs. my little girl was so proud of her doll not to mention she is one of a twin that was lost during pregnancy and the sister of twinn brothers. i was lucky i could get one for my daughter and if anyone else wanted one for their daughter it’s called make sacrifies for your child. people spend loads of money on toys every christmas and birthdays that just end up thrown aways or shipped to a good cause for someone else. atleast i know my money was well spent and appriciated and will be kept forever to all of u people get a life and find something else to bitch about k.
Meg
December 28th, 2007 at 7:33 am
@Kim (assuming you are real and not just bored): Your personal tragedy has understandably made you hypersensitive about your doll. I don’t think anyone was personally attacking you, your daughter, or the special meaning the doll has in your lives.
It’s great that your daughter will cherish and care for her doll for all eternity. But again, yours is a special case. I think most children receiving a MyTwinn doll think of it as any other toy and not as a reminder of their deceased sibling. My children often inadvertently break cherished toys, though that may just be because they are spawn of a disturbed sicko in need of a life.
Admittedly, there were some disturbing aspects in my comments, though nothing that had to do with not liking a doll. The rest of the comments were pretty tame and reasonable. Finding a particular toy creepy does not a “desturbed sick oh” make. Honestly, if I were you, the only comment I’d find slightly offensive is Tara’s.
Mike
December 28th, 2007 at 10:15 am
Uh.
Kim, you mention that your daughter has a lost “twin” but is the sibling of “twinn” brothers. Does that mean there’re more male dolls in the product line than just the gay baseball fan, or am I picking on a typo?
Second, I’m not sure why it’s relevant that your girl had lost a twin during pregnancy (sad as that is) unless you’re implying that her Twinn Doll is somehow a replacement — which goes right to the heart of what’s so chilling about these things.
Although, I do cop to being a desturbed sick oh.
Meg
December 28th, 2007 at 5:43 pm
Damn! You totally stole my tagline. Now my only choices are:
“Ships things to good causes”
“Does not sacrifice for children”
“In need of a life and something to bitch about”
Sarah
February 22nd, 2008 at 8:09 pm
Maybe some people just need to lay off on the “Child’s Play” movies. I honestly don’t see anything wrong about these dolls, I find them to be a very good idea from whomever came up with it.
I don’t get it, why is it ok for little girls to have dolls that create freakish body images, like Barbie or Bratz, but it’s not ok for them to have a doll that looks like themselves?
Having a doll with their own features may very well help building a good self esteem foundation. It shows the child that different is not necessarily wrong or bad, helping them to accept and celebrate their individuality. Which, in my opinion, is far better than having a doll with unreachable and inhuman perfection, exposing them at a very young age to the ridiculous beauty patterns created my today’s media.
Not liking these dolls because you find them to be “scary” is a personal opinion and it’s perfectly acceptable, but then saying it is disturbed and wrong is at the very least ignorant. Whitout mentioning, offensive to the parents who purchased the doll for their children.
And just to clarify, the dolls were not meant to be some sort of “plastic duplicate”, according to the company, what they try to do is “create a likeness of your child based on the information we receive from you. Like a portrait, each personalized doll is an artistic likeness, not an exact replica.”.
I am not a My Twinn doll owner or fan of any sorts, I just don’t think it’s very nice to act so passionately against
something that could actually be very helpfull or at the very least be a long lasting souvenir of your childhood.
Mike
February 25th, 2008 at 4:14 pm
Hm.
It’s possible that you didn’t think I was trying to be offensive, or that I thought this was broad-ranging fare for everyone to enjoy… you know, the way everyone would enjoy opening a box on their birthday and finding that their parents (i.e. mother) had spend hundreds of dollars on a doll that looks exactly like them.
Or, don’t birthdays work like that?
But no. In truth I am seeking to offend the people who have bought — or are considering the purchase of — a MyTwinn doll. They’re really weird, and give me a break with the body-image thing, honestly.
How does buying a toy that identically resembles a parent’s perception of their child do anything other than simply re-locate the issue from one place to another? Get this: Maybe Kara hates her braids, maybe she wears her purple pajamas because her mother nags her to, and maybe Olivia would rather die than wear a pink Santa hat. You want to talk body image, then tell me how a MyTwinn does anything other than send the message, “This is how I see you, this is you as the child I love, this is how you should look.”
Or, don’t parents force their kids into idealized molds?
It doesn’t have to be a conscious thing — most people don’t act weird or creepy on purpose — and I’m very sure that the intentions are good. But God damn, shouldn’t the lesson be not to look to any external source to build one’s self-image, rather than simply selecting a preferred channel?
And, just to clarify, the whole business is founded on building dolls that look “JUST LIKE” people’s kids. It’s all over the ad copy, it’s all over the walkthroughs and FAQs — it’s the whole point. Otherwise people would grab the Cabbage Patch kid that looks closest to their daughters (or sons who look like baseball disco queens) and suffice.
“Like a portrait, each personalized doll is an artistic likeness, not an exact replica” is entirely appropriate ass-covering language to protect MyTwinn from customers who freak out that Haley’s mole wasn’t positioned exactly-perfectly on her cheek, or Calah’s eyes are a different shade of blue than what the doll has.
Or, don’t consumers freak out when their expensive custom purchases come and aren’t exactly what they expected?
It’s hard to say. I’m ignorant.
Sarah
February 26th, 2008 at 2:04 pm
Hm, maybe first you should decide whether you were or not trying to be offensive. Then, you should try and be born again, but this time as a girl so you can experience all the issues we go through, before you ask me to give you a break with the body-image thing, honestly.
I take it you never played with dolls, so you wouldn’t know that you can actually change the doll’s clothes and hair styles. Yeah, so if Kara hates her braids, she can take the braids off of her doll. Which will perhaps even send a message to her mother who obviously didn’t comprehend that her daughter hates it.
I do realize that parents can force their kids into their own idealized molds, but that does not mean that the child has to be a quiet soldier forever. And in this case, the doll could help this break-free experience smoother for both parent and child.
And the parents conception of their children can easily be turned in to the kid’s perception of themselves, since it’s the child who plays with the doll. Just like Kara, Olivia can simply get rid of the stupid pink Santa hat and then maybe her mom will think:”Oh, I don’t think Olivia likes her hat!”. Do you see? It’s really not that hard.
The point of having a doll with your features can help a child to love her own image. And yes, the lesson should be not to look to any external source to build one’s self-image. But the exterior image is also very important because we don’t live in an ideal world and because children don’t have a very accurate perception of internal beauty yet so, as you mighty know, they do judge appearances.
Looking at a doll that has the same “flaws” as yourself, can help the child to realize that maybe they are not so bad. That the “bullet holes” freckles are actually kinda cute; “my doll and i have it and screw the girls at school that laugh at me, i freaking like them!”. Do you understand?
Not being the only one with the “issue” it’s actually a good thing when you are a kid, even if the other “person” is a doll.
And regarding the resemblance between child and doll, i do not believe they are actually suppose to be a xerox of one another. The “just like me” is the advertising motive, to give the idea that your son or daughter can have a doll that looks “just like” them.
But it’s clearly not a perfect miniature… personally, I don’t even think they look like their owners that much. The whole point is to have the same features (i.e. eye color, hair color, moles, freckles, etc.). So the child can relate to their My Twinn, more than they would with a regular doll. And I still don’t think there is anything wrong with that.
And just so you know, i never called you you - Mike - ignorant. I said that bashing the dolls and anybody that has anything to do with them as “downright freaky”, “psychotic”, “chilling” “upsetting” and so on, was offensive and an ignorant attitude.
I am not trying to offend anybody here, i just found that these twisted and baseless arguments were (whether you meant them to be or not) very cruel, and felt i had something to say.
Elizabeth
March 12th, 2008 at 3:07 am
I’m laughing out loud at this post. I am looking for someone who can make custom-made dolls that look like my daughter. I just don’t want to preserve her, I just thought she’d enjoy playing with a little doll that looked like her. It wasn’t about self-esteem because, as I’m sure you guessed, she is much more beautiful than any Cabbage Patch doll. (Ha, ha. No, she is, really, but that is not the point.)
It is funny that you should find it so creepy. Kids like to play with dolls that look like them.
That said I also found My Twinn creepy, overpriced, and worse, poor on concept (all the faces are the same, they just change the colors). Let me know if you find anything really creepy such as dolls that even change eye shape and nose shape based on pictures, will you? Cheers.
Elizabeth
March 12th, 2008 at 3:11 am
Can I edit the above post? I just want to mention that that is how I found this blog. Love the blog.